Truth, Hope, & Growls
A Grassroots Community for Active Progressives
YES WE CAN

Barack Obama
Barack Obama
Music Video

"Yes We Can" is a music video, based on the words of Barack Obama, featuring Scarlett Johannsson, John Legend, Herbie Hancock, Kate Walsh, Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Adam Rodriquez, Kelly Hu, Amber Valetta, and Nick Cannon.

Watch the video, "Yes We Can," on YouTube. Read the back-story on ABC.

NO WE CAN'T

John McCain
Music Videos
John.He.Is—No You Can't

John.He.Is and No You Can't are parody music videos, using the words of Senator John McCain, in the style of the Barack Obama video, "Yes We Can."

Watch the videos on YouTube: John.He.Is and No You Can't.

Beta Release

Beta Version 1.3 - This is the first imperfect public release of EdgyBear.com. The site is open, not closed, so anyone on the Internet can view it.

YOU CAN HELP: Please tell others about EdgyBear.com and visit regularly yourself.

PROBLEMS? Please report any mistakes or glitches (like broken links) by email to:
feedback@edgybear.com.
Seven Blunders

"The seven blunders that human society commits and cause all the violence:
wealth
without work,
pleasure
without conscience,
knowledge
without character,
commerce
without morality,
science
without humanity,
worship
without sacrifice, and
politics
without principles."


—Mahatma Gandhi (1947)

support world wide web consortium

support creative commons

Best Viewed on Any Browser

Archives

To see past versions of top EdgyBear features, visit:

Edgy Growls
Open Letters
Rabbit Hole
Unspoken Truth
Voices from the Wilderness
What Is EdgyBear?

Grassroots Community for Active Progressives

Welcome to EdgyBear. Come right in. Grab a chair. Sit down and stay for a spell. Put your feet up. You're among friends. Let's talk, dream, and scheme about changing the world.

EdgyBear lives for sincere authenticity. Together, we form both a virtual (on-line) and real-world (off-line) grassroots community for active progressives.

You'll love it here, IF . . .
  • Politically, you call yourself progressive, on the side of the weak, the poor, and the powerless.

  • You love America and hate all the worldwide damage done by George W. Bush & crew.

  • You fight for liberal values like human rights, personal freedom, balance of powers, and other quaint stuff in the U.S. Constitution.

  • You can laugh at yourself and life—even more so at dumbass politicians.

  • You are bored by empty talk without action—you're ready to make a difference.

  • You are a bold individualist who cares about real issues and know you're not alone.

  • You'd like to share your voice, ideas, and actions with like-minded folks.
Does any of that sound kinda like you?

Truth is: Some folks will enjoy EdgyBear even though they say "no" to most of the criteria. That's great. Expect us to welcome all viewpoints—just don't expect us to be "fair and balanced." We have an attitude. (Why do you think we're called "Edgy"?)

To learn more about EdgyBear, visit these places:
∼ END ∼
Obama Wins North Carolina
Clinton Edges Win in Indiana
Unspoken Truth

BUSH DEFENSE SECRETARY ADMITS
9/11 WAS BLOWBACK


by Don Williams

22 Apr 08


You won't find the above headline anywhere else. Believe me, I've tried. Still, it's true.

In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on April 10, 2008, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates made the following jaw-dropping statement:

"We were attacked from Afghanistan in 2001, and we are at war in Afghanistan today, in no small measure because of mistakes this government madeÐmistakes I among others made in the end game of the anti-Soviet war there some 20 years ago."

That's an astonishing confession, even if mine was the only jaw that dropped. Gates is the first high official in the Bush administration to acknowledge what war critics have been lambasted for even suggesting. OK, he didn't use the word Òblowback,Ó but by definition, that's what he's talking about.

A certain radio commentator once all but called me a traitor for suggesting what Gates openly admits. Many others, including the Rev. Jeremiah Wright most recently, have been denounced all over this country for suggesting 9/11 was caused by failed U.S. policy. Yes, Wright said much else as well. Nevertheless he took a hit for stating the same notion.

So why are Big Media silent about Gates? You tell me. Eventually, this story might show up on Page 5 in your local daily, especially if this column gets around, but it will never be top of Page One, where it counts, just as you never saw the following headlines there when they might've made a difference:

US. LOOKS THE OTHER WAY AS PAKISTAN PERFECTS NUCLEAR BOMBS AND DELIVERY SYSTEM

COUNTING FLORIDA OVER-VOTES WOULD PUT GORE IN WHITE HOUSE

SAUDI OIL PROFITS LINKED TO SPREAD OF WAHABISM

WAR WILL COST 100 TIMES MORE THAN BUSH TEAM PREDICTS (OIL WILL NOT PAY FOR IT)

BUSH SUPPRESSES EVIDENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING

NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION FOUND IN IRAQ

NO AERIAL DRONES, NO NEW ANTHRAX, NO YELLOWCAKE, NO NEW CENTRIFUGES

NO SIGNIFICANT LINKS FOUND BETWEEN AL-QAEDA AND SADDAM

CASE FOR INVADING IRAQ INCLUDED RAVINGS FROM A TORTURED MAN AND LIES FROM A CRIMINAL WITH TIES TO IRAN

SECRET MEMOS REVEAL U.S. TOLD ENGLAND WE'D 'FIX THE EVIDENCE' TO SUPPORT JOINT IRAQ ATTACK

BUSH BUILDING PERMANENT MILITARY BASES IN IRAQ

BUSH HANDS CONTROL OF IRAQ TO NATURAL ALLIES OF IRAN

PROMINENT BUSH SUPPORTERS BELIEVE HE'S PREPARING WAR FOR THE RAPTURE

MILITARY SOURCES SAY U.S. LET MANY IN TALIBAN AND AL-QAEDA SLIP THE NOOSE AT TARA BORA

DECISION TO TORTURE ORIGINATED IN WHITE HOUSE

U.S. SOLDIRERS COMMITING SUICIDE AT RECORD LEVELS

COST OF ONE CRUISE MISSILE COULD BUILD 80 SECULAR SCHOOLS IN AFGHAN VILLAGES

No, you seldom saw headlines like these leading the page when they might've made a difference, though columnists were writing about them in the back pages, carefully citing our evidence.

One by one, all the things we were pilloried for saying out loud are being confirmed, and I can prove the truth of each of the above headlines to the satisfaction of any reasonable reader. In fact, because all except the headline at the top of this page have long since been proven trueÑthe whole lousy shooting matchÐlet's talk about that one.

Despite denials from Bush and other hawks, the rise of the Taliban and al-Qaeda was a direct result of our policy of funding and arming Muslim Jihadists in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as Gates knows all too well.

Gates' precise role in their rise is unclear. After all, his career consisted of operating from the shadows, including 26 years in the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Council, and under President George H.W. Bush as Director of Central Intelligence.

Still, it's easily provable that he at least cheered on arming and training fundamentalist Muslims who later resurfaced as al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and members of the first post-Soviet Afghani government the Taliban overthrew with our tacit approval.

All you have to do is click on Amazon.com and ask for Gates' book "From the Shadows: The Ultimate Insider's Story of Five Presidents and How They Won the Cold War" to discover Gates' support for the "end game" in Afghanistan.

Turns out this was the opening gambit for Islamic Jihadists and we're now in the middle of an unending "game" which most Americans neither asked for nor desired.

In his book, Gates outlines how America began infiltrating Afghanistan with secret forces in a self-conscious effort to lure the Soviet Union into invading Afghanistan and "give the Soviets their Vietnam." The process started under President Carter but reached flood tide under Presidents Reagan and Bush 41, when American operatives trained, armed, funded and otherwise empowered radical fundamentalist Muslims who later set their sights on us.

As I documented in a column at the time of Gates' confirmation, he also had a role in the Iran/Contra affair as well as in our policy of providing aerial maps showing Saddam where to bomb Iran while, at the same time, selling Iran anti-aircraft weaponry during the Iran/Iraq War. How cynical was that?

How many innocent people have died as a result of Gates' and others' manipulations? Millions in Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan? Tens of thousands in Central America? Thousands more in Kuwait? Let's not forget nearly 3,000 on 9/11.

Gates deserves credit for admitting out loud what many have been slammed for pointing out. The difference between Gates and critics like me however—besides the obvious ones of power and influence—is that Gates sees 9/11 as blowback from a narrow failure to fine-tune the end game in Afghanistan. Thus his straight-faced statement in the Senate hearing that, "If we get the end-game wrong in Iraq, I predict the consequences will be far worse."

What Gates won't acknowledge is that chess is a game of destiny, in which end-games are often predestined by opening gambits. The philosophy of having an American shadow government arming secret armies and then using American military might or dark machinations to wreck other countries and change regimes is always going to be a gamble, more often than not leading to disaster, because violence begets violence and the Law of Unintended Consequences is not revoked.

Just look at the Unintended Consequences of such meddling in Iraq. Ethnic cleansing, torture, loss of rights and privacy here, a trillion dollars squandered, and counting. End game be damned. The consequences already have proven horrendous.

Gates can't bring himself to admit that empowering the leaders of Islamic jihad was a horrible mistake that ruined millions of lives and now endangers world civilization.

What puzzles me is why no one else within the reach of his voice dares trumpet this admission that 9/11 represents a failed and cynical policy of violence and manipulation from the shadows. And why none in the major media dare point out that, for once, a Bush official has acknowledged blowback. Even if he won't say the word.

Copyright © 2008 Don Williams
All Right Reserved



The Rabbit Hole

My Big NAY-Sayer Congressman

BearCat

Based on a Submission by BearCat
22 Apr 08


Have y'all in Tennessee's First Congressional District happened to notice our new Congressman (David Davis, Republican) seems to "just say NO" against lots of worthwhile things?

For example, this year, Rep. Davis has already voted . . .

NAY, 4/16/08
AGAINST
the Jubilee Act for Responsible Lending and Expanded Debt Collection Act (H.R. 2634) - to provide for greater responsibility in lending and expanded cancellation of debts owed to the United States and international financial institutions by low-income countries.

NAY, 3/14/08
AGAINST
amending FISA (the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978) to establish a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence.

NAY, 2/27/08
AGAINST
the Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008 (H.R. 5351) - to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax incentives for the production of renewable energy and energy conservation.

NAY, 1/17/08
AGAINST
the S-MINER Act (H.R. 2634) - to establish improved mandatory standards to protect miners during emergencies.

NAY, 1/17/08
AGAINST
the HOPE VI Improvement and Reauthorization Act (H.R. 3524) - to reauthorize the HOPE VI program for revitalization of severely distressed public housing.

Thankfully, the negativity and a-ginnin' of Congressman Davis was useless. All five of these pieces of legislation got passed anyway by the U.S. Congress.

In fairness, it should be noted that Davis is in favor of something. For example, he voted YEA for having "plain language" in government documents (H.R. 3548), YEA for calling on the Government of China to end its crackdown in Tibet (H.R. 1077), and YEA to authorize ocean exploration and undersea research.

Just don't ask him to support helping distressed nations, restoring the Constitution, saving the environment, helping the poor and needy, or protecting vulnerable workers.

You can track the voting records of any Senator or Congressman by visiting the site, Congress.org.

You can also subscribe to a free email to track the votes by your own Senators and Representatives at MegaVote.

EDITOR'S NOTE: "BearCat" is a fine Southern lady with a good heart, a keen mind, and a social conscience, who prefers to stay anonymous.

Suggestions for Improvement?

Send your ideas and comments to
feedback@edgybear.com.
Creative Commons License Rights Reserved