The scores below for each candidate are based on hard specifics from the candidates themselves—from their websites, public statements, and past histories. NOTE: For fuller data, see: Who Stands for What?

The core question was not: "What are they saying?," but more: "What would they likely do?" What specific programs did candidates create and support while in other offices? What specific action plans do they now propose to solve each problem?

Clearly, scores are only the opinions of the editorial board of edgybear.com. Also, as candidates make new statements or change their positions, our scores on them may change, too.

What Each Candidate Score Means

STRONG - Displays a deep understanding and strong commitment to the issue, beyond conventional thinking. Has produced a well-thought-out program for action. Has a workable vision for meaningful major change outside the status quo.

GOOD - Displays serious understanding and good commitment on the issue. Has defined programs for taking action. Appears to address the issue as more an improvement of the status quo than as a rigorous search for revolutionary change.

OKAY - Seems to understand and be committed somewhat on the issue. Has expressed qualified support for the need, but delivered less depth in fresh ideas or plans for action. Has shown no big vision for major change beyond the status quo.

FAIR - Displays a limited understanding and little progressive thinking on the issue. Opposes action programs that bring real change. May express partial agreement that a problem exists, but typically offers inadequate solutions that may make things worse.

WEAK - Displays a poor understanding and weak commitment on the issue. Expresses an outlook that seems negative towards change, undemocratic, and anti-progressive. Leans towards policies that favor the rich and powerful over the weak and poor.

Worth Repeating: These scores are not based solely on stated positions by candidates, but more on their proven ability and published action plans for each progressive issue. The question--based strictly on the 12 progressive issues--is: "Can this person best lead the United States as its President into a better future and a bold new direction towards major progressive change?"